Friday, September 26, 2003
The upcoming Physics911.org  will feature a detailed restatement of the "Bumble Planes" hypothesis in light of the most recent 9/11 evidence.
From the article by A. K. Dewdney, Ph.D.:It is possible to produce the appearance of a terrorist attack on the United States by means that do not employ terrorists, as such, but by the simple substitution of one aircraft for another, particularly when the transponders of the aircraft involved are turned off. The only people who need to be deceived by such an operation are the radar operators at air traffic control (ATC) centers.
The scenario explored here, called Operation Pearl (after Pearl Harbor), has been described in sufficient operational detail that sound judgments can be made about a) feasibility and b) consistency with evidence on the ground. At the time of this writing it is probably the best available description of what probably took place on September 11, 2001.
Under the Operation Pearl scenario, the passengers of all four flights died in an aerial explosion over Shanksville, PA and the remaining three airliners are at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.
[...]
3 The Evidence Filter
Any scenario constructed to account for the events of September 11 2001 must pass a graduated test, as embodied in the following items. These fall into three classes:
Suspicious circumstances- Four of the named hijackers were not in the United States.
- The WTC towers collapsed without adequate heat stress.
- Smaller aircraft accompanied Flights 77 and 93.
- Most of the alleged hijackers were rather poor pilots.
- Evidence of the alleged hijackers developed too quickly.
- Westward excursion of Flights UA93 and AA77 are inexplicable as terrorists hurrying to targets."
Anomalies- The US Air Force failed to intercept any of the flights.
- The hijackers' names did not show up on passenger lists.
- The hijackers' faces did not appear on boarding gate videos.
- Black boxes were missing from all but one flight.
Contradictions- The Pentagon was not struck by a large passenger aircraft.
- Cellphone calls alleged to have been made by passengers were essentially impossible.
- A successful scenario must at least explain the contradictions and account for a majority of the anomalies. It is of course desirable that it also account for the suspicious circumstances, but no scenario need stand or fall in this regard.
It must be remarked that the only scenario ever supplied to the public via the official media was the Bush-Cheney scenario, that Arab hijackers seized control of the four aircraft and proceeded to pilot them into national landmarks, killing both themselves and their passengers. Clearly, the Bush-Cheney scenario, considered in detail, explains none of the suspicious circumstances, none of the anomalies and is directly contradicted by the facts adduced in the third category. As scenarios go, it is a distinct failure.
[...]
4.1 Radar Substitution . . .
4.2 Aircraft transponders. . .
4.3 Remote Control . . .
4.4 Electronic towing. . .
5.2 Swapping aircraft . . . TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS: This is indeed "probably the best available description of what probably took place on September 11, 2001." Other, unmentioned anomalies which the Pearl/Bumble scenario accounts for are the total absence of suicidal tendenecies on the part of the alleged hijackers and eyewitness reports of the first plane to crash in Manhattan as being a small commuter jet.
The Physics911.org site is still not officially open to the public, but the URL for this particular article has been floating around the web and is indexed on google. Prof. Dewdney, of University of Western Ontario, said on the Cloak & Dagger radio show Thursday night that he other degreed scientists will be opening the site proper in a week or so. .....---
.....| Posted at 02:28 | PERMA-LINK |
|
FEED
TOTAL411 PODCAST
SELECTED VIDEO ]