TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Friday, March 18, 2005

Compiled by Tennessee rock band Uberkinder in 2003, web-archived somewhere in Italy:

Undeniable Proof that Paul McCartney was replaced with a Look-Alike:
Part 3 of Facial Comparison: The Smoking Gun.
Here finally is the definitive proof ... We've already seen how stunningly accurate a photographic facial comparison is; a persons core features: distance between the ears, chin line, nose length and shape and outline of the skull do not change by any significant degree from the mid-twenties until the day of one's death; any first year biology student can tell you this.

Baring this in mind, let us take the last official photo of Paul McCartney from early 1966, and compare it with the first official photos of him from early 1967. With only nine months between them these pictures should be a perfect spot-on match.

Quickly, before we compare the pre and post 1966 pictures, let's review the previous comparisons and re-establish just how perfectly these photos SHOULD match, considering that they are looking straight into the camera in both of them:

  
      (With the Beatles-1963+Yesterday and Today-66)         (Sgt. Pepper + Spies Like Us) 

     Now here we go, watch the ears, nose and chin closely closely: 


Are you as shocked as I was? Both pictures are straight down the middle; we have equalized the distance between the eyes, and you have already seen that this comparison should be an almost perfectly clean crossfade. But instead, the nose changes in length and width, the chin changes dramatically from an almost perfectly symmetrical one with a cleft straight down the middle, to a very uneven, crooked, and pointy chin with the cleft offset to the left (his right). The second man's head is taller and thinner that the first. The first man has a very wide, round face, the second has a tall thin face.

Observe the "Sgt. Pepper to Spies Like Us" comparison above; clearly minor change in angle should NOT have this dramatic effect on the photos.

As you will see in the "Actual Head Size" section, the first man's head clearly does not looks right on the second man's shoulders. Pauls's head was much smaller and rounder overall, with a much shorter and straighter chin, and more delicate, childlike features.

[...]

Some more pictures of pre-67 Paul (on the left) and post-67 "Paul" (on the right)

 
 
 
 


Labels: beatles

| Posted at 13:27 | PERMA-LINK |

Comments:

Post a Comment