[ Keeping an eye on
the Eye of Horus. ]

[PLEASE USE FEED]
SEND TIPS

[TOTAL411.INFO HOME]
[TOTAL411 PODCAST]
[TOTAL INFO RADIO]
[TOTAL INFO YOUTUBE]



[NEWS.GOOGLE WIRES ]
9/11
AFGHANISTAN
CIA
FAUX PAUL
FEDERAL RESERVE
FREEMASONRY
IRAQ
DEAD KENNEDYS
MI6
MILITARY EXERCISES
MOSSAD
TERROR DRILLS

[ INFO LINKS ]
AIN'T IT DROOL
AMERICAN FREE PRESS
ANTIWAR.COM

JACK BLOOD
CATO @ LIBERTY
CITIZENS/LEGIT-GOV
CLOAK & DAGGER
CNSNEWS.COM
COUNTERPUNCH
CTRL
CRYPTOME
DEAD PELICAN
DRUDGE REPORT
FATE/HILLY ROSE-->
RADIO FETZER
FRIENDS OF LIBERTY
NEWS GOOGLE
NOREEN GOSCH
HUFFINGTON POST
HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE
HUMINT EVENTS ONLINE
INFO CLEARING HOUSE
INFOWARS
MILITARYCORRUPTION.COM
NARCO NEWS
NOMOREFAKENEWS.COM
RON PAUL
OCCULT BEATLES
PID: NOTHING/REAL

PRISON PLANET
PROPAGANDA MATRIX
RAW STORY
REASON.COM
RENSE.COM
REVERE RADIO
RIGOROUS INTUITION
LEWROCKWELL.COM
RUMOR MILL NEWS
SCHOLARS - 9/11 TRUTH
SPELUNKING/CHAOS
STRIKE THE ROOT
TOTAL 911 INFO
WASH POST
WASH TIMES
WAYNE MADSEN REPORT
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED
WIRED NEWS
WONKETTE
WORLDNETDAILY

[ LIVE AUDIO ]
REVERE [64k]

[ SELECTED VIDEO ]

COMING LATER

[ Archives ]

Powered by Blogger




TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Total911.info::REVERE RADIO NETWORK::Total Info Radio

Monday, June 20, 2005

Is 'Downing St memo' a honey trap?

    This webmaster and other researchers have suspected that the so-called "Downing St memo" may grow into an impeachment sideshow that, while legitimate in and of itself, may ultimately distract from the Bush Administration's complicity in 9/11. (Just as the Lewinsky impeachment distracted from Clinton's arms-to-China, etc.)

    Now a researcher on 911TruthAction suspects the memo itself may be a forged honeytrap. It could be that, like the forged Bush National Guard memo, the document expresses something true that is nevertheless being built up in order to be discredited.:
    I put together this crude webpage showing Michael Smith, author of the Downing Street memo articles to be an MI6 insider. I claim no personal expertise in this area but find the memo itself unconvincing for the reasons below:

    1) Sir David Manning is extremely unlikely to circulate ultra-sensitive memos like that to anyone including the prime minister. Was it filed in a drawer ? The language is not of the highest quality either.

    2) The British government didn't deny it's contents No investigation has been launched into the leak.

    3) The British government could have used a so called 'D notice' to prevent publication in ANY newspaper or magazine which they have numerous times in the past. [ "In the UK, a 'D notice" is a censorship notice issued by the Department of Defence to the media to prohibit the publication of information on matters alleged to be of national security. The system dates from 1922."]

    4) It was published in a Blair supporting Murdoch newspaper. That's enough in itself. Would Americans find it credible if it had been leaked by Fox News ?

    5) All the US authorities have to do is deny it. No individual or organisation is specified as the source of the American information.

    6) Congress would find it easier to get Elvis as a witness than the head of MI6.
.....---
.....| Posted at 10:25 | PERMA-LINK |

      Comments:

      Interesting... The DSM situation does seem to be a strange one...
      thx
       

      Post a Comment