TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

No plane? No shit? Hey nice missile. It does loke like the nose in the photograph. But where did all those passengers go? We're never gonna see the other tapes, are we? THis is laughable. I need to go watch those squibs pop off the corner of wtc 7 one more time to feel secure...
 

Bullshit comes no purer than this.
 

Its like this....You wouldn't go in front of college students and try and convince them that the tooth fairy is real. But you could use the same argument in front of a bunch of kindergartners and most likely will convince them. That's exactly how our govenment think of us. Like we are a bunch of adolescents waiting to be told what to think.This is another great example of how easy it is to brainwash a large group of people (Americans) into believing anything we see or in this case don't see. Tell me my fellow Americans....how does it feel to be a nation of sleeping cattle waiting to be led off to the slaughter?

DO THE KNOWLEDGE!!!! PEACE!!!
 

Two words: OPERATION NORTHWOODS

Google is our secret weapon!

Here's some more good photos of the new 2nd video, which shows the fuselage REALLY is shaped and painted like like a Global Hawk:
www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=18&t=20719

www.geocities.com/killer_robot_jetplanes
www.boeing.com/phantom/
www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil

USAF Museum Unpiloted Vehicle Museum
Killer Robot Aircraft since World War 1
www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/ind/uvind.htm

Pirate News TV
www.PirateNews.org
http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/piratenewsrss/message/255

September 911 Surprise
www.september911surprise.com

Eric Hufschmid: What if they show a video of Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon? This is going to disrupt us. That's like saying, you shouldn't talk about the Kennedy assassination because they might bring forward a video that shows Oswald shooting Kennedy. I mean, what are we supposed to do, be silent, because they MIGHT do something like that? This is rediculous! It's almost just another way to get people to be quiet. Like trying to fool people into saying nothing, on the rounds that maybe we'll make fools of ourselves.

John Stadtmiller: That was my initial response to that, when I heard people talking about, "they may be setting a trap for us." I could see a lot of people out there taking that hesitant pause, stepping back just a little bit. And that's not what should be done right now. This should be going full-bore right down their throats!

Eric Hufschmid: Yeah. This is a sign that they're desperate. They're very worried. You know, when you're doing good you don't back off! You go forward! This is the time to go at em. This is a sign they're getting weak. They're hurt. You don't back off, you charge forward faster, now. we got em!
www.rbnlive.com, 17 May 2006 MP3 archive

"I did not have any knowledge of and was not a member of the plot to hijack planes and crash them into buildings on Sept. 11, 2001. I wish to withdraw my guilty plea and ask the court for a new trial to prove my innocence of the Sept. 11 plot. I have never met Mohammed Atta and, while I may have seen a few of the other hijackers, I never knew them or anything about their operation."
—Zacarias Moussaoui (Frenchman), US v. Moussaoui, 1:01-cr-00455 (Virginia), "Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea", May 8, 2006
http://notablecases.vaed.uscourts.gov/1:01-cr-00455/DocketSheet1.html

Pete Williams: "The old outbursts were gone... He was very docile today... We believe that he's wearing one of those stun belts, and it may be that he was very worried about doing anything that would cause those Marshals to press the button...."
Dan Abrams: "A stun belt? They literally have something around his waist? That they can push a button and?"
Pete Williams: (Pause) "Well..."
—MSNBC, "MSNBC VIDEO: Moussaoui wore 'stun belt' for new testimony"
http://www.total411.info/2006/03/msnbc-video-moussaoui-wore-stun-belt.html

"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it. I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons. I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders' rules.
The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations."
-USAma Bin Laden (CIA code name Jew Tim OSSman when in California buying SAMS from CIA), business partner with Bush family since 1947, brother Salem Bin Laden was George Bush Jr's first business partner in Arbusto Oil in Texas, his other brother Shafig Bin Laden was dining with Sir George Bush Sr Knight of the British Empire and Carlyle Group (owner of Serenity) on 9/11/2001 in Washinton DC, CNN, "Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks," September 17, 2001
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Tony Snow: "I want to be clear because I've heard you say this, and I've heard the President say it, but I want you to say it for my listeners, which is that the White House has never argued that Saddam was directly involved in September 11th, correct?"
Dick Cheney: "That's correct. We had one report early on from another intelligence service that suggested that the lead hijacker, Mohamed Atta, had met with Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague, Czechoslovakia. And that reporting waxed and waned where the degree of confidence in it, and so forth, has been pretty well knocked down now at this stage, that that meeting ever took place. So we've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming."
—WhiteHouse.gov, The Tony Snow Show, "Interview of the Vice President by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006 (Snow was promoted to White House Press Secretary, then in May, all televised news conferences were cancelled or the remained of Bush Jr's presidency, as punishment for Steven Colbert's especially vicious roasting of Bush Jr at White House Correspondents Dinner)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060329-2.html

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta testifies on Dick Cheney's STAND DOWN order:
Mineta responds to an opening question by Commissioner Hamilton about the events in the PEOC and an alleged "shoot down" order. He describes a conversation between Cheney and a young man:
Mineta: "During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President...the plane is 50 miles out...the plane is 30 miles out....and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president "do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said "Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!??"
Mineta explains that while he had not known it at the time, he had surmised that the standing order the young man asked about must have been a shoot down order. Hamilton, looking a bit confused, seeks clarification about which flight the conversation was regarding, and Mineta once again clarifies that it is the flight that hit the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. on September 11.
www.911truthmovement.org/video/hamilton_win.wmv
www.911truthmovement.org/video/hamilton_real.rm
www.911truthmovement.org/video/hamilton_qt.mov
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y

"It's easy to imagine an infinite number of situations where the government might legitimately give out false information. It's an unfortunate reality that the issuance of incomplete information and even misinformation by government may sometimes be perceived as necessary to protect vital interests."
—US Solicitor-General Theodore "Ted" Olson, in Jennifer K. Harbury vs. United States (US Govt confessed that CIA tortures US citizens to death and perps narcoterrorism), at the US Supreme Court, on 17 March 2002 (his estranged 3rd wife Barabara Olson, attoney at law and CNN talkinghead disappeared on September 11, 2001, allegedly on American Airlines Flight 77 that never hit the Pentagon)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&court=US&case=/us/000/01%2D394.html

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Operation Northwoods - James Banford from ABC News reported on Pentagon's Operation Northwoods plot to perp domestic terrorism in USA to blame a foreign nation and "justify" invasion, declassified in 2000
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2005/10/7209.php
http://BodyOfSecrets.com

"Towers that fell 'like a controlled demolition'. Planes that vanished then mysteriously reappeared, and crucial evidence that has been lost for ever. In the Pentagon, a top secret team drew up a plan to simultaneously send up two airliners painted and numbered exactly the same, one from a civil airport in America, the other from a secret military airbase nearby. The one from the airport would have military personnel on board who had checked in as ordinary passengers under false names. The one from the airbase would be an empty drone, a remote-controlled unmanned aircraft. Somewhere along their joint flight paths, the passenger-carrying plane would drop below radar height, and disappear, landing back at the airbase and unloading its occupants in secret. Meanwhile, the drone would have taken up the other plane's designated course. High over the island of Cuba, it would be exploded in mid-air after broadcasting an international distress call that it was under attack from enemy fighters. The world would be told that a plane load of blameless American holidaymakers had been deliberately shot down by Fidel Castro's Communists - and that the US had no choice but to declare war and topple his regime. This Top Secret 'agent provocateur' plan - code named Operation Northwoods and revealed in official archives - dates from 1962 when the Cold War was at its height and was declassified in 2000."
-Tony Rennell, London Daily Mail, "9/11 ON TRIAL -Towers that fell 'like a controlled demolition'. Planes that vanished then mysteriously reappeared, And crucial evidence that has been lost for ever. A new book raises bizarre yet deeply unsettling questions about the world's worst terror atrocity…" August 6, 2005
http://www.financialoutrage.org.uk/911_mainstream_media.htm

"Operation NORTHWOODS may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. Operation Northwoods had called for nothing less than the launch of a secret campaign of terrorism within the United States in order to blame Castro and provoke a war with Cuba."
—James Bamford, ABC News, "Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba," May 1, 2001
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1
http://bodyofsecrets.com

"In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation NORTHWOODS, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro. America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. The Joint Chiefs at the time were headed by Eisenhower appointee Army Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer, who, with the signed plans in hand made a pitch to McNamara on March 13, 1962,
recommending Operation Northwoods be run by the military. Whether the Joint Chiefs' plans were rejected by McNamara in the meeting is not clear. But three days later, President Kennedy told Lemnitzer directly there was virtually no possibility of ever using overt force to take Cuba, Bamford reports. Within months, Lemnitzer would be denied another term as chairman and transferred to another job. Ironically, the documents came to light, says Bamford, in part because of the 1992 Oliver Stone film JFK, which examined the possibility of a conspiracy behind the assassination of President Kennedy. "The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after," says Bamford."
—David Ruppe, ABC News, "Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba," May 1, 2001
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

"We could blow up a drone (unmannded) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. The presense of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The US could follow with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existant crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation. We could develop a Communist Cuba terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Flordia cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States. Use of MIG-type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping, and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type palnes would be useful. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce that fact. Hijacking attampts against US civil air and surface craft should be encouraged. It is possible to create an incident which would demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civilian airliner from the United States. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be subsituted for the actual civil aircraft and the passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rondevous. From the rondevous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly to an auxiliary airfield at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. Meanwhile the drone aircraft will continue to fly the filed flight plan. The drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency "MAY DAY" message stating it is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow IACO radio stations to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident. It is possible to create an incident that will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly Tail-end Charlie. While near the Cuban island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. This pilot would then fly at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who performed the mission under an alias would resume his proper identity. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared. A submarine or small craft would distribute F-101 parts, parachute, etc. The pilots retuning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts f aircraft found."
—Jewish Zionist General L.L. Lemnitzer, chairman Joint Chiefs of taff at Pentagon
Memo to Secretary of War Robert McNamara
Subject: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba
March 13, 1962 (declassifed 2000)
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Fox TV's Lone Gunmen pilot episode - Broadcast in March 2001, re Pentagon and CIA hijacking a US airliner by remote control and crash it into the Rockefeller's World Trade Center, declassified in 2000 http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2005/09/6758.php

"I don't trust government. And neither should our citizens."
—US Senator Larry Craig (R), United States Senate, Committee on the udiciary, "DOJ Oversight: Terrorism and Other Topics", testimony by US Attorney General John Ashcroft re President George Bush Jr.'s illegal Executive Orders to "legalize torture" of US citizens and refusal to release that memo (felony Contempt of Congress), C-SPAN2, June 8, 2004

"A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator. I don't know where Usama is, and I don't care. The Constitution is just a goddamn piece of paper!"
-George Bush Jr

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Bush Sued by RICO Act - 9/11 victims sue Bush Gang under RICO Act for perping domestic terrorism and mass murder on 9/11/2001. Stanley Hilton (R) vs traitorous media whores Shaun Hannity and Alan Colmes for Jewish Australian porno king pimp daddy Sir Rupert Murdock Knight of the British Empire, owner of Faux News.
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2005/10/7209.php
 

Un pequeño dato, según el gobierno, los pasajeros del avión estrellado contra el Pentágono fueron identificados mediante el ADN, pero el ADN se destruye totalmente a los 600 Cº, pero resulta que el fuselaje y todo el resto del avión de desintegró? . Cuando para ello es necesario más de 1000 Cº durante un largo espacio de tiempo. Resumiendo se puede recuperar el ADN de las supuestas victimas, pero ninguna parte o restos del avión?. -MG-