Thursday, May 18, 2006
 Richard Curtis, Ph.D., an adjunct professor of philosophy at Seattle University and a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth had an op-ed published in the local major daily paper. Some excerpts from Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Tuesday, May 16, 2006: "[...]The commission's conclusions and recommendations should be totally rejected. Its story is full of lies, distortions and omissions of fact. ...
Six of the men named by the government are still alive and have never even been to the United States. We know that because European media (as reported by The Associated Press, the London Telegraph and the BBC) have interviewed them.
[...]In the months after 9/11 all of the surviving New York City Fire Department personnel who were on the scene were interviewed. Those oral histories were recorded and withheld from the public until Aug. 15, 2005. Only after losing in court three times did the city of New York finally release them. All 503 are now posted on The New York Times Web site. Why did the city fight so hard to keep them from the public?
It turns out those oral histories reveal details about what was happening in the World Trade Center buildings that are completely inconsistent with the tale told by the commission. Dozens of firefighters and medics reported hearing, seeing and feeling explosives going off in the buildings that collapsed. Why were there explosives, very powerful explosives by all accounts, going off in the buildings? More disturbing, why was the pattern of those explosives identical in some important ways with the pattern used in a planned implosion (or controlled demolition of a building)?
[...]
-----
.....---
.....| Posted at 15:13 | PERMA-LINK |
|
FEED
TOTAL411 PODCAST
SELECTED VIDEO ]