|
|
TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSISTotal911.info::REVERE RADIO NETWORK::Total Info RadioThursday, September 14, 2006VIDEO: Ex-Bush official tells Fox 9/11 inside job
Fox got at least three basic facts about Reynolds wrong, of course -- Reynolds has left Scholars for 9/11 Truth (not "Scholars for Truth") and is retired from Texas A&M. Fortunately, Reynolds was smart enough not to waste his limited time correcting these matters and went straight into the crimes of the perps. FoxNews refused to show WTC7's collapse, just as with other guests, and when Reynolds explained the TV fakery aspect, would only show stills, not the full videos which clearly show a "plane" melting into the building. .....| Posted at 13:03 | PERMA-LINK |
Bullshit. Bullshit Bullshit Bullshit. My pathetic ass could have represented better than Reynolds. Paranoia tells me he's cointelpro. Or he's got chronic fatigue syndrome maybe. Three minutes of sounding like a sleepy nutjob. Way to go Professor.
And what "bullshit" might that be?
Post a Comment
Oh, you must mean that proving OTHER aspects of the 911 crime are important, but exposing the fantasy of aluminum-skinned jet planes penetrating solid iron and concrete and the media being complicit in the crimes are NOT important. For those who still think the wings of an airliner can penetrate several feet of solid steel and concrete consider the following: A duck flying into a jet's wing at 10 miles an hour (say on a runway) will bounce right off the wing, maybe hurting the duck, but not the airplane's wing. The same duck hitting the jet's wing at high altitude speeds of 400+ mph can literally rip the jet's wing off, or at the very least causing the wing great damage. Imagine what would happen to a jet's wing colliding with 5 inches of solid steel and 40 inches of concrete at 500+ miles per hour, as was the case with the WTC towers on 911. The wing would disintegrate; it would NOT slice through as if it were a cloud. Yet this is what "911 truth seekers" would have you believe. They base their research on the manipulated TV footage broadcast that day and the videos created from that single feed. People who really want to know what happened on 911 would be better served waking up to the extent of control over TV broadcasts and STOP following certain "heroes" like Mike Berger and the other limited-hangout 911 "leaders." I've talked to Morgan on several occasions; I can assure you, he's the real deal. Unfortunately, the perps behind the 911 crime (it was NOT an act of war) will benefit either way. Their goal is to destabilize and destroy what remains of the U.S. This is the reason Morgan and others against the official version have been allowed a few spots on TV. The perps know that as more Americans lose faith in their Government and its leaders, the citizenry's hope will be minimized and the country more easily conquered. Morgan, myself and others agree though -- there is no other way. The country cannot continue as is with criminals in charge over our lives and economy. It would be better to have a constitutional collapse and bankruptcy with a greater potential thereafter for re-structuring and formation of a more people and earth-friendly nation -- one where Americans' best interests are represented rather than a few central bank members, or Israel. One thing's for certain though, there were NO big Boeing planes slicing into the towers like hardened titanium through butter. If you believe that, you're living a cartoon fantasy. ![]() |