Sunday, November 05, 2006
The message following explicates something that researchers in other fields have already learned -- the importance of vintage documentation. And that's not just written documentation. Photographic documentation, video documentation and audio documentation all must be examined while keeping in mind its chain of custody. If the instituion releasing the documentation is suspect, the researcher must strive to use the orginal, vintage documentation, lest said institution doctor the documentation and send the orginal down Orwell's proverbial memory hole.
Condensed from the 911wasahoax blogspot maillist, via Planehuggers Anonymous 10/30/2006: "The 9/11 movement must stop using post-9/11 productions to prove their points! To even discuss or argue something that is less than 2 years old . . .What the movement has done is trade reality and authenticity for a sharper and more deceptive substitute.
[...]
[THEWEBFAIRY.COM]
On 9/11, this what we all saw--rough, engine drooping, but plenty good enough to deceive us, if shown at full speed. Which is what we saw that morning. First you see just as you did that morning, and then look again at the same clip in slow motion, and extremely enlarged, and now you'll understand everything.
Now the extreme enlargement. [GALLERIZE.COM] ...
Where does the "plane" go? Is there any movement at all in the pixels to the right of the green spire? Could the plane have gone into the green spire instead of the bldg? There should be a 25% deceleration upon contact with anything.........but the disappearing tail is going just as fast, the same speed whether there was a bldg. there or if there was nothing there to stop it!
No deceleration.
No pieces of debris.
No movement from flying concrete or steel.
No passengers flying out.
That's because it's a simulation--a two-second clip that was slipped in that fooled the world. So we don't know what caused the towers to explode.
[The first photo above] after-production creation was done by Aaron Taub, as a reaction to my discovery on the original footage shown on telelvision within the first 24 hours which showed conclusively that the public was shown a fake... What is the first thing you notice that they changed? They moved the buildings, the green spire, and closed the gap! [...]
Visual evidence must be limited to that which was shown to the world on TV on the earliest hours of 9/11.---- not all the stuff distributed after that, which is new and improved deception!
[...]
THEY leave stuff for us to find, (and quietly remove any photos that are a threat) --where all the naive researchers grabbed it up since it "was sharper". [...]
----- Labels: 9/11 .....---
.....| Posted at 13:32 | PERMA-LINK |
|
FEED
TOTAL411 PODCAST
SELECTED VIDEO ]
