Sunday, December 31, 2006
 Condensed from 911logic blogspot December 07, 2006: "Now let’s move on to our next "eyewitness," Richard Davis. Mr. Davis was supposedly in his office on the 39th floor of a building at or near 50th Street and 5th Avenue. [...]
There is a Richard R. Davis that works at Bessemer Trust Company NA, which just so happens to operate out of the International Building [630 5th Avenue]. This Richard R. Davis holds degrees from both Columbia (MBA) and Yale (LLB). He currently serves as Bessemer's Managing Director, Secretary and General Counsel.
As it turns out, Bessemer has a very prestigious client base. They proudly proclaim to manage over 46 billion dollars for only 1800 clients. 92% of these clients are individuals, accounting for almost 42 billion dollars. A little math tells us that the average individual client is entrusting Bessemer with 25 million dollars.
[...]
Checking out the outgoing message on his answering machine ... I am now satisfied that the "eyewitness”"who called CBS, the executive at Bessemer Trust [was] – Mr. Richard R. Davis.
Analysis – Richard R. Davis’ "Eyewitness Account"
... The "eyewitness account" of Richard R. Davis can be heard from 6:10 until about 9:00 Video Run Time (VRT).
Once again, the keyword "deliberate" is being employed by an "eyewitness." By this point, I can only speculate that this keyword was designed to help bridge the gap between an "accident" and a "terrorist attack."
...From his vantage point 0.8 miles behind the "plane," he was apparently able to conduct a maintenance evaluation as it flew the remaining 3 miles or so away from him (at an approximate rate of 500mph) until it "struck" WTC1.[...]
While it is believable that Richard could have identified a "two-engine jet" from 0.8 miles away, it is not believable that he could determine that there was nothing wrong with it. It is also questionable as to whether he could have still seen it from 4 miles away.
However, once again, I really don’t care about the "first plane" anyway. What makes Richard’s "eyewitness account" so impossible are his statements about the "second plane." At about 7:50 VRT, Richard declares "We saw the second one come up the Hudson and veer into the second building."
This is truly amazing. Not only were these people able to spot the "second plane" coming toward them from over 4 miles away (remember the 16ft fuselage diameter), once again Richard was able to determine with great certainty that "there appeared to be nothing wrong with the aircraft" and that "it was flown very deliberately into the building." These statements are absolute hokum. He may as well have stated that he saw the pilot giving him the finger (too bad - that would have saved me the trouble).
I’d be curious to have a gander out the window from Richard’s office myself. I wonder exactly how much of his view of the towers would have been obscured by the Empire State Building (or any other buildings for that matter).
Conclusion
[...] Even if there had been a plane in the air, it is a ridiculous notion that he would have been able to both spot it and characterize its behavior from over 4 miles away.
If he lied about seeing the “second plane,” how much of a stretch do you suppose it would be to believe he also lied about seeing the “first plane?” While considering this, take into account that due to its proximity to him, the Empire State Building should have obscured much
This vantage point would have hindered him from tracking the "first plane," as he claims to have first "noticed" it "by the time it was passing the Empire State Building."
As far as how close Richard Davis' relationship is to the "9/11 planners," I’ll leave that up to you to decide for yourselves. I'm guessing he knows quite a bit more than your average 9/11 stooge.
Of course, albeit educated – my "guess" is useless without subpoena power. Can I get a show of hands for any takers?
----- - And it turns out Bessemer Trust manages the Bush family fortune
.....---
.....| Posted at 12:05 | PERMA-LINK |
|
FEED
TOTAL411 PODCAST
SELECTED VIDEO ]