Friday, January 19, 2007
 Leading 9/11 Scholar Dr. James Fetzer put Los Alamos Weapons Scientist Dr. Steven E. Jones on the hotseat Wednesday as Jones attempted to discount any notion that directed-energy weapons developed at Los Alamos were used to destroy the World Trade Center.
-
 FULL 2-hr PROGRAM [via 911podcasts.com]
- 35-min HIGHLIGHT REEL [via Coffinman]
Major points in the discussion:
a) Jones now claims that the buildings weren't really pulverized or "powderized" (Jones' own word in a published paper) because most of the dust (he) tested was "supercoarse" (5% of a millimeter) dust. This is a transparent attempt to obfuscate the disintegration of 3000 people, which is not very nice
b) Fetzer talked over Jones a lot, which Jones says was "not nice."
c) Jones claims only his thermite theory can start a "new investigation" and therefore discussing any other possible causative factor vis-a-vis the destruction of the World Trade Center is "a game."
d) Jones claims that "superthermite" can explain why almost everything except the four walls of WTC 6 disappeared; and that superthermite can also explain anomalous damage to WTC3.
e) Fetzer was unconvinced by Jones' argument the WTC "bathtub" foundation was severely damaged; maintaining that the fact the entire PATH and subway system wasn't flooded is evidence the structural integrity remained despite any superficial damage.
.....---
.....| Posted at 15:04 | PERMA-LINK |
|
FEED
TOTAL411 PODCAST
SELECTED VIDEO ]