TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Louder Than Words has obtained 140 hours of NORAD audio tapes from 9/11. Two hours of these tapes will premiere tonight at 6pm EDT on the Revere Radio Network, the worldwide home of free speech. Dr. Kevin Barrett posted this summary of the situation vis-a-vis the tapes to 911blogger.com :

"The first journalist granted access to the 9/11 NORAD tapes -- the recordings of air defense personnel communicating with each other during the events of 9/11--was Michael Bronner, who published a pro-9/11-Commission article in the August, 2006 issue of Vanity Fair. But now, according to Jason Bermas, Loose Change has obtained an even more extensive set of NORAD 9/11 tapes than the one Bronner used!

Bermas broke the news to host Kevin Barrett on 9/11 and Empire Radio Tuesday night on http://wtprn.com. The show, which also featured Rev. Rich Lang, is archived at http://mp3.wtprn.com/Barrett07.html.

According to Bermas, Loose Change has obtained over 100 hours of tapes -- significantly more than the 30 hours that Bronner said he used in writing his article. The tapes obtained by Loose Change consist of 21 audio files of 399 minutes or more per file, allegedly detailing all NORAD communications during 9/11. Bermas said that Loose Change has downloaded the files to another server and will torrent them starting tomorrow--stay tuned to 911blogger and the forum at http://loosechange911.com

The NORAD tapes are one of the most puzzling, controversial, yet crucial areas of 9/11 research. One thing everyone agrees on is that the tapes prove top US military officials have lied about the US air defense response on 9/11. But the question of which of their several incompatible stories are lies, and which if any are true, remains to be fully resolved.

David Griffin's book Debunking 9/11 Debunking opens with a close reading of the NORAD tapes controversy, based on the portions of tape and transcript that were then available through Bronner's article. The upshot: Top US military leaders have told essentially three different stories to excuse the lack of air defense response on 9/11 -- and each one is more unbelievable than the last. But their most recent version, enshrined in the 9/11 Commission Report, is seemingly supported by the snippets of NORAD tape presented in Bronner's article. Griffin points out that this version, despite the apparent support of the tapes, is extremely implausible if not impossible. The best explanation, given all the available evidence, is that some of the NORAD tapes have been forged, doctored, and/or cherry picked in order to create a false story that exonerates the military, while falsely implicating FAA personnel in what would be extreme criminal negligence. The close study of the NORAD tapes, now that over 100 hours are available to researchers, may help clarify the situation.

Bermas said that Loose Change obtained the tapes simply by asking for them repeatedly from NEADS. The tapes are supposedly unclassified, but the Loose Change crew was given the run-around for months before finally being presented with the 21 audio files.

The Loose Change folks will be discussing this exciting breakthrough and more, and premiering Loose Change Final Cut, at the 6th anniversary benefit for the 9/11 first responders in New York: http://wearechange.org I'll be there to give a talk at the 9/11 Truth Ready for Mainstream Weekend: http://ready4mainstream.ny911truth.org/ It will be wonderful to have these two great events just a few blocks from each other. See you there!
-----




Labels: 9/11, norad, revere radio, wargames

| Posted at 15:14 | PERMA-LINK |

Comments:
Are Louder Than Words, Kevin Barrett, Jason Bermas, & David Griffin saying that the "unclassified" NORAD tapes controversy proves that there were no planes flown on 9/11 and that it was a media hoax?


#

posted by  Anonymous : 31/8/07 09:17

 

An irony is that the Loose Change kids live a short drive away from NEADS (North East Air Defense Sector, the Air National Guard unit that controlled the fighters for NORAD on 9/11). The crew there, all pretty nice folks, would surely tell them their stories. But I suppose that's not the kind of "truth" these guys go for.

Another irony, or not, is that this David Griffin apparently wrote a full chapter of his book on Bronner's Vanity Fair piece without bothering to contact the author. What nonsense.

People who question are fellow travelers up until the point their addictions to their sundry conspiracy theories prove immune to reality. They question everyone but themselves. And at that point they become dishonest. -MB


#

posted by  michaelbronner : 3/9/07 18:36

 

In US Air Force, my job as a nuclear weapons and explosive demolitions specialist, I was paid by the US government to sabotage US military bases, sabotage US government buildings, and sabotage US military aircraft, using conventional C4 shaped-charges and detonation cord, in explosive controlled demolitions. This is a common job for 1,000s of US soldiers every day. This portion of 9/11 has not yet been told: that bombing US Govt buildings is a routine scenario, "in case of retreat from enemy invasion", or whatever BS wargame lie they use to mind-control their slaves, er, gullible employees. In 1980s, US nukes in England were targeted at WESTERN Europe, not the Commies. Dick Cheney offered a Pentagon job to Tech Sergeant Tami Lee,
my wife, as reward for getting the Pentagon USAF chief of staff fired while leading Operation Desert Storm (giving Iran-Iraq NATO weapons stockpiles during Iran-Contra). Filing felony charges CAN be done against ANYONE at ANYTIME, in ANY court, even against a president. Jr Bush has already been arrested 4 times, plus his demotion to mail clerk for refusing a drug test in TANG, and sentence of 6 months extra duty for desertion during war, er, "police action". Full story of Operation el Dorado Canyon US/UK invasion of Libya in 1987, while US special forces rescued Gadaffi, at PirateNews.org/pentagon_whistleblower.html

NO WAY did USAF/NORAD stand down on 9/11 without following illegal orders from the White House. As a combat vet, I instantly knew it was an inside job the morning of 9/11/2001, I just didn't yet know who was more powerful than USA, to get the entire US Govt to stand down and commit treason.


#

posted by  Anonymous : 19/9/07 02:43

 

Post a Comment